On the contrary, murder demonstrates a lack of respect for human life. producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize and improve the law, removed capital punishment from its Model Penal Code. William Bailey investigated the validly of the argument for murder and capital punishment as being a deterrent Anti capital punishment essay. Of all those convicted on a charge of criminal homicide, only 3 percent — about 1 in 33 — are eventually sentenced to death. Cost of the Death Penalty The death penalty costs more than life in prison. Bedau, H. htm l; Kevin Johnson, anti capital punishment essay, Lawsuit Seeks to Block Imports of Key Execution DrugUSA Today, Feb.
Related Documents
Jump to navigation Skip navigation. The American Civil Liberties Union believes the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. Furthermore, we believe that the state should not give itself the right to kill human beings — especially when it kills with premeditation and ceremony, in the name of the law or in the anti capital punishment essay of its people, and when it does so in an arbitrary and discriminatory fashion. Capital punishment is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system.
The death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice. Through litigation, legislation, and advocacy against this barbaric and anti capital punishment essay institution, we strive to prevent executions and seek the abolition of capital punishment. The death penalty system in the US is applied in an unfair and unjust manner against people, anti capital punishment essay, largely dependent on how much money they have, the skill of their attorneys, race of the victim and where the crime took place. People of color are far more likely to be executed than white people, especially if thevictim is white.
The death penalty is a waste of taxpayer funds and has no public safety benefit. The vast majority of law enforcement professionals surveyed agree that capital punishment does not deter violent crime; a anti capital punishment essay of police chiefs nationwide found they rank the death penalty lowest among ways to reduce violent crime. They ranked increasing the number of police officers, reducing drug abuse, and creating a better economy with more jobs higher than the death penalty as the best ways to reduce violence. The FBI has found the states with the death penalty have anti capital punishment essay highest murder rates. Innocent people are too often sentenced to death. Sinceover people have been released from death rows in 26 states because of innocence.
Nationally, at least one person is exonerated for every 10 that are executed. Anti capital punishment essaythe Supreme Court declared that under then-existing laws "the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty… constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. GeorgiaU. The Court, anti capital punishment essay, concentrating its objections on the manner in which death penalty laws had been applied, anti capital punishment essay, found the result so "harsh, freakish, and arbitrary" as to be constitutionally unacceptable.
Making the nationwide impact of its decision unmistakable, the Court summarily reversed death sentences in the many cases then before it, which involved a wide range of state statutes, crimes and factual situations. But within four years after the Furman decision, several hundred persons had been sentenced to death under new state capital punishment statutes written to provide guidance to juries in sentencing. These statutes require a two-stage trial procedure, in which the jury first determines guilt or innocence and then chooses imprisonment or death in the light of aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Inthe Supreme Court moved away from abolition, holding that "the punishment of death does not invariably violate the Constitution. Subsequently 38 state legislatures and the Federal government enacted death penalty statutes patterned after those the Court upheld in Gregg. Congress also enacted and expanded federal death penalty statutes for peacetime espionage by military personnel and for a vast range of categories of murder. Executions resumed in Since then, states have developed a range of processes to ensure that mentally retarded individuals are not executed. Many have elected to hold proceedings prior to the merits trial, anti capital punishment essay, many with juries, to determine whether an accused is mentally retarded.
Inthe Supreme Court held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution forbid imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed, anti capital punishment essay in commutation of death sentences to life for dozens of individuals across the country. As of Augustover 3, men and women are under a death sentence and more than 1, men, women and children at the time of the crime have been executed since Despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Gregg v. Georgiaet al, the ACLU continues to oppose capital punishment on moral, practical, anti capital punishment essay, and constitutional grounds:.
Capital punishment is cruel and unusual. It is cruel because it is a relic of the anti capital punishment essay days of penology, when slavery, branding, and other corporal punishments were commonplace. Like those barbaric practices, executions have no place in a civilized society. It is anti capital punishment essay because only the United States of all the western industrialized nations engages in this punishment. It is also unusual because only a random sampling of convicted murderers in the United States receive a sentence anti capital punishment essay death. Capital punishment denies due process of law. Its imposition is often arbitrary, and always irrevocable — forever depriving an individual of the opportunity to benefit from new evidence or new laws that might warrant the reversal of a conviction, or the setting aside of a death sentence.
The death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. It is applied randomly — and discriminatorily. It is imposed disproportionately upon those whose victims are white, anti capital punishment essay, offenders who are people of color, anti capital punishment essay, and on those who are poor and uneducated and concentrated in certain geographic regions of the country. The death penalty is not a viable form of crime control. When police anti capital punishment essay were asked to rank the factors that, in their judgment, reduce the rate of violent crime, they mentioned curbing drug use and putting more officers on the street, anti capital punishment essay, longer sentences and gun control. They ranked the death penalty as least effective.
Politicians who preach the desirability of executions as a method of crime control deceive the public and mask their own failure to identify and confront the true causes of crime. Capital punishment wastes limited resources. It squanders the time and energy of courts, prosecuting attorneys, defense counsel, juries, and courtroom and law enforcement personnel. It unduly burdens the criminal justice system, and it is thus counterproductive as an instrument for society's control of violent crime. Limited funds that could be used to prevent and solve crime and provide education and jobs are spent on capital punishment.
Opposing the death penalty does not indicate a lack of sympathy for murder victims. On the contrary, murder demonstrates a lack of respect for human life, anti capital punishment essay. Because life is precious and death irrevocable, murder is abhorrent, and a policy of state-authorized killings is immoral. It epitomizes the tragic inefficacy and brutality of violence, rather than reason, as the solution to difficult social problems. Many murder victims do not support state-sponsored violence to avenge the death of their loved one, anti capital punishment essay. Sadly, these victims have often been marginalized by politicians and prosecutors, who would rather publicize the opinions of pro-death penalty family members.
Changes in death sentencing have proved to be largely cosmetic. The defects in death-penalty laws, conceded by the Supreme Court in the early s, have not been appreciably altered by the shift from unrestrained discretion to "guided discretion. A society that respects life does not deliberately kill human beings. An execution is a violent public spectacle of official homicide, and one that endorses killing to solve social problems — the worst possible example to set for the citizenry, and especially children. Governments worldwide have often attempted to justify their lethal fury by extolling the purported benefits that such killing would bring to the rest of society.
The benefits of capital punishment are illusory, but the bloodshed and the resulting destruction of community decency are real. Deterrence is a function not only of a punishment's severity, but also of its certainty and frequency. The argument most often cited in support of capital punishment is that the threat of execution influences criminal behavior more effectively than imprisonment does. As plausible as this claim may sound, in actuality the death penalty fails as a deterrent for several reasons. A punishment can be an effective deterrent only if it is consistently and promptly employed.
Capital punishment cannot be administered to meet these conditions. The proportion of first-degree murderers who are sentenced to death is small, and of this group, an even smaller proportion of people are executed. Although death sentences in the mids increased to about per yearthis is still only about one percent of all homicides known to the police. Of all those convicted on a charge of criminal homicide, only 3 percent — about 1 in 33 — are eventually sentenced to death. Betweenthe average number of death sentences per year dropped toreducing the percentage even more. Mandatory death sentencing is unconstitutional. The possibility of increasing the number of convicted murderers sentenced to death and executed by anti capital punishment essay mandatory death penalty laws was ruled unconstitutional in Woodson v.
North CarolinaU. A considerable time between the imposition of the death sentence and the actual execution is unavoidable, given the procedural safeguards required by the courts in capital cases. Starting with selecting the trial jury, murder trials take anti capital punishment essay longer when the ultimate penalty is involved. Furthermore, post-conviction appeals in death-penalty cases are far more frequent than in other cases. These factors increase the time and cost of administering criminal justice. We can reduce delay and costs only by abandoning the procedural safeguards and constitutional rights of suspects, defendants, and convicts — with the attendant high risk of convicting the wrong person and executing the innocent. This is not a realistic prospect: our legal system will never reverse itself to deny defendants the right to counsel, or the right to an appeal.
Persons who commit murder and other crimes of personal violence often do not premeditate their crimes. Most capital crimes are committed in the heat of the moment. Most capital crimes are committed during moments of great emotional stress or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, when logical thinking has been suspended. Many capital crimes are committed by the badly emotionally-damaged or mentally ill. In such cases, violence is inflicted by persons unable to appreciate the consequences to themselves as well as to others. Even when crime is planned, the criminal ordinarily concentrates on escaping detection, arrest, and conviction. The threat of even the severest punishment will not discourage those who expect to escape detection and arrest. It is impossible to imagine how the threat of any punishment could prevent a crime that is not premeditated.
Furthermore, the death penalty is a futile threat for political terrorists, like Timothy McVeigh, because they usually act in the name of an ideology that honors its martyrs. Capital punishment doesn't solve our society's crime problem. Threatening capital punishment leaves the underlying causes of crime unaddressed, and ignores the many political and diplomatic sanctions such as treaties against asylum for international terrorists that could appreciably lower the incidence of terrorism. Capital punishment has been a useless weapon in the so-called "war on drugs. It is irrational to think that the death penalty — a remote threat at best — will avert murders committed in drug turf wars or by street-level dealers.
If, anti capital punishment essay, severe punishment can deter crime, then permanent imprisonment is severe enough to deter any rational person from anti capital punishment essay a violent crime, anti capital punishment essay. The vast preponderance of the evidence shows that the death penalty is no more effective than imprisonment in deterring murder and that it may even be an incitement to criminal violence. Death-penalty states as a group do not have lower rates of criminal homicide than non-death-penalty states, anti capital punishment essay.
Use of the death penalty in a given state may actually increase the subsequent rate of criminal homicide. Perhaps because "a return to the exercise of the death penalty weakens socially based inhibitions against the use of lethal force to settle disputes…. In adjacent states — one with the death penalty and the other without it — the state that practices the death penalty does not always show a consistently lower rate of criminal homicide. For example, between l and l, the homicide rates in Wisconsin and Iowa non-death-penalty states were half the rates of their neighbor, Illinois — which restored the death penalty in l, and by had sentenced persons to death and carried out two executions.
bravery essay
The death penalty is known for punishing criminals of mass crimes such as murder; the death penalty is the capital punishment for a murderer that is convicted or guilty of the crime. This means thirty-one states are using the death penalty as a punishment. I believe that the death penalty should be abolished in the United States, there are many reasons how our country would benefit from not using this type of punishment. The Death Penalty Should be Abolished Immediately In the United States 31 out of the 50 states still have the death penalty. This portrays how many states still support the inhumane form of punishment, other known as capital punishment. Those in favor of the death penalty argue that people who commit gruesome crimes deserve to be executed for them.
The death penalty is intolerable and should be abolished everywhere in the United States because of its botched executions, high costs, innocent people being executed, and religious beliefs being broken. In this reactionary type of system, American judges often use the death penalty for crime that do not warrant such a horrific penalty. In some cases, it is has been found that criminals charged with murder and sentenced to death may have been innocent. After they are put to the death, there is retrial or process in which to free them from being wrongly accused. According to the federal government, the death penalty is completely legal, but it should be considered a cruel and unusual punishment and, therefore, a violation of the 8th amendment because it kills innocent people and promotes more death.
One example of how the death penalty violates the 8th amendment is shown through the innocent people that have been wrongly executed, increasing the rate of executions. Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Should the death penalty be abolished? The answer is a resonating, no. I say this because even though the death penalty in my mind is against what I believe about not killing humans, we have human killing other humans.
So with that there must be a punishment that can help deter the murderers of this world not to kill. That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment. Woodson v. North Carolina, U. It seems as though it wanted to promote and increase the number of executions. The act goes against religion, in many religions execution is an immoral act; this is another way that the death penalty is in violation of the constitution. The mentally ill is executed, in Atkins v. Virginia, Atkins was convicted of armed robbery, and capital murder.
However due to his mental issues and being diagnosed with mental retardation, his case was affirmed and he was sentenced to life in prison instead. Home Flashcards Create Flashcards Essays Essay Topics Writing Tool. Essays Essays FlashCards. Browse Essays. Sign in. Flashcard Dashboard Essay Dashboard Essay Settings Sign Out. Home Page Examples Of Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment. Examples Of Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment Words 4 Pages Open Document. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. It is arguable that life in prison causes a much higher degree of suffering than a short prison sentence and then a pain free death.
Another question when assessing the ethical appropriateness of the death sentence is whether it actually works as a crime deterrent. In a survey was carried out to establish the connection between the death penalty and rates of murder. Irrespective of the moral and ethical position of capital punishment, it is arguable that to cause so much suffering to the individual is bordering on torture, and is wrong. Some means of execution are clearly probable to cause suffering. Examples of this are execution by strangulation, lethal gas and electrocution, to name just a few. Other methods, such as firing squads and beheading have been banned because they were considered too brutal, or because the executioner had to be too closely involved.
Many countries now opt for the lethal injection method of execution as it is thought to be less severe for both the offender and the executioner. However, there are known flaws with this method, including the necessity for a medical professional to be involved in the actual killing; this is a contradiction to medical ethics. The Penry v. Lynaugh case provides a sound example of the issues surrounding this matter. In , in the state of Texas, Pamela Carpenter was raped and stabbed to death in her home Chan. Before Carpenter died in hospital she was able to give the police a description of her attacker.
The description led the police to Johnny Paul Penry. Penry confessed to the crime and he was charged with capital murder. However, the conviction was the most simple part of what was to be a very long and complicated case. Penry was assessed by a clinical psychologist who testified that Penry had an IQ of fifty-four and, although he was twenty-two at the time of the trial, he was reported to have the learning age of a six-year-old and the social maturity level of a nine or ten-year old. What proceeded was a long trial in which there was a distinct lack of consensus among the Justices.
Eventually the court ruled that it is not cruel and unusual punishment to sentence a mentally retarded person to death under the eighth amendment. This position could be argued as wrong as, by definition, every mentally retarded individual is handicapped in his mental abilities and, therefore, his culpability. The death penalty for mentally retarded individuals is not banned by common law or by national consensus. However, it almost definitely violates the matter of proportionality; mentally retarded criminals do not possess the levels of culpability worthy of the death sentence.
Another example levels of culpability coming into question is when sentencing juveniles. A study investigated the eighth amendment of societal consensus and proportionality with reference to juvenile death penalties Crosby. A selection of individuals who had previously worked as jurors were asked to vote on whether to execute a defendant in an hypothetical case. The majority of the participants chose to execute the defendant in all of the situations. A high rate of death sentences for the 15, 16, and year-old defendants may not be quite so startling; the finding that a majority of our sample of former jurors, specifically Supreme Court sustained the structure of the death penalty.
Sixteen years later the Court finally addressed this structure regarding juvenile offenders. In , in the Thomson v. Oklahoma case, a majority of the Court decided that giving the death penalty to a fifteen-year-old defendant constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth amendment. Nevertheless, just two years later in the Stanford v. Kentucky case, a ruling percentage of the Court ruled that the death penalty was not unconstitutional when sentencing a sixteen or seventeen-year-old defendant Crosby. This seems an unethical decision. seventeen-year-olds are not yet even legally allowed to drink alcohol. Imposing the death sentence onto a defendant of such a young age could be argued to be barbaric. Further to implementing capital punishment, the nation goes one step further and decides that it is appropriate to televise the executions.
Robert Bryan Bedau speaks about his time defending individuals facing the death penalty. Bryan views the U. He claims that executions bring out the worst in people, and have done throughout history. Most people have seen movies featuring scenes of capital punishment; the on screen audience are shouting and throwing objects at the person about to be killed, and then at the moment of death the crowd erupts into excitement and cheering. As Bryan rightly points out, these scenes are historically accurate. William Bailey investigated the validly of the argument for murder and capital punishment as being a deterrent Bailey. In order to do this he examined the monthly homicidal rates alongside the amount of television exposure of executions from through to Bailey found no evidence that the amount of television exposure of executions had a significant effect of deterrent on the homicides during the period studied.
He claims that as television has become the most depended on news medium then any deterrent to murder would be displaying the punishment via this means. He concludes that the current numbers of executions or broadcasts of such neither dissuade nor encourage murder Bailey. Capital punishment provokes debate in the U. and all over the world. However, a government who would allow and promote the implementation of the death penalty cannot really be upholding either principle. The ethical arguments against capital punishment are vast, ranging from philosophies on the value of life to basic human rights. Furthermore, the degree of disagreement within the Courts is a concern.
The case of John Penry illustrates the point that a courtroom is made up of many people who will not always unanimously agree. If a decision cannot be made unanimously over an issue as fundamental as this one, then there should be no opportunity for someone to be sentenced to death despite it. It is an embarrassment that America, one of the leading and most respected nations in the world, can still be using this out-dated tradition. Bailey, W. American Sociological Association. American Sociological Review, Vol. May Bedau, H. OUP USA. Chan, P. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Northwestern University. Crosby, Catherine, Preston Britner, Kathleen Jodi and Sharon Porwtood.
Law and Human Behavior, Vol. We accept sample papers from students via the submission form. If this essay belongs to you and you no longer want us to display it, you can put a claim on it and we will remove it. Just fill out the removal request form with all necessary details, such as page location and some verification of you being a true owner. Please note that we cannot guarantee that unsubstantiated claims will be satisfied. Note: this sample is kindly provided by a student like you, use it only as a guidance. ID Subscribe to WowEssays Premium and get access to over 1 MILLION high-quality downloadable samples. GET ACCESS NOW. Password recovery email has been sent to email email. HIRE WRITER PREMIUM DATABASE Sign in. HIRE WRITER PREMIUM DATABASE.
Type of Paper. Essay Topics. Educational Tools. Who We Are Contact Us Our Writers Honor Code WowEssays Reviews Blog Our Services. ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS. Premium samples database Get access to over 1 MILLION samples with WowEssays Premium! LEARN MORE. A particularly contested area of capital punishment regards the sentencing of individuals with learning disabilities. Works Cited Bailey, W. shtml Bedau, H. Amnesty International. The Free Dictionary. United States. Social Issues. Mentally Retarded. Eighth Amendment.
Cite this page Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Vancouver Chicago ASA IEEE AMA. Accessed 07 January Against Capital Punishment Argumentative Essay Examples. December Accessed January 07, Retrieved January 07,
No comments:
Post a Comment