Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Flag burning essay

Flag burning essay



Related Topics. Since not everybody flag burning essay tobacco, flag burning essay, governments ought to ban public smoking, this is because the act is usually inconvenient to those who do not smoke. There are more important issues than arguing over something that has been decided by the Supreme Court and something that is even protected by the Constitution. Branching off of that there is also flag desecration, which is basically abusing a flag in public. The people opposed to this have blown everything so far out of proportion, it is beginning to become unbelievable.





Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?



Name Professor Class Date Freedom of Speech: Flag Burning Flag burning has been one of the most controversial forms of nonviolent protests. It is often linked with the Middle East and Hezbollah with depictions of Arabs against President Bush burning the American flag. Americans are intimidated and threatened by this action, but that does not make it illegal. Supreme Court rulings have upheld that peaceful flag desecration is a form of political speech that should be protected by our Constitution Flag Burning Myths, flag burning essay. This decision is the most logical. Even with all of the disruption this act may cause, flag burning should not be banned.


Before even arguing to keeps the laws the way they are, take a look at the logic that is presented. The Boy Scouts are responsible for disposing of ruined or soiled flags. The only appropriate and respectful way to dispose of the American flag is to burn it Apel. Now, when hippie protesters burn the flag the only difference is the thought. Is it logical to be distraught about bad thoughts? The First Amendment protects our speech and forms of expression and it is considered one of the most important Amendments. Flag burning is considered, flag burning essay, as far as the Supreme Court is concerned, as a form of expression. Ironically, on the same terms, the First Amendment can bring punishment.


The controversy of the legality of flag desecration was taken to the Supreme Court. Johnson was punished by having to serve a one year jail sentence and a fine for two thousand dollars Oyez. After he paid his fine and served his jail time, he took his case to the Supreme Court where it was fount that desecration of the flag was protected as a freedom of expression under the First Amendment Oyez, flag burning essay. Flag burning is not intended to represent violence; that is not to be confused with protest. There needs to be a proper time, place and valid reason to show support for a certain view. A person cannot go with irrational anger to shove his two-cents down the throats of all the surrounding people.


Flag burning is to be thought of more as a demonstration to attract attention and spread around an ucommon thought reather than a disruption in society. A large group flag burning essay people have correlating opinions with the world-reknownd transcendentalist author Hendry David Thoreau. Paranoia is definitely an obstable within the government. What if the protester becomes violent? Why should we even allow him to begin his demonstration? Granted, that situation could very well happen with the low tolerance that is continuing to grow, flag burning essay it is not valid that the only trigger of the war would be the flag.


Ther must be other previous issues that have been unreolved and big enough that flag burning essay would be willing to fight for them, flag burning essay. By this prevelant paranoia approach, the government could easily overstep its bounds and restrict more than just flag burning. This would, in turn, cause a revolt against the government and not the support that the government is looking for. Passing an amendment to protect the flag would be a harsh insult to all the veterans who fought so hard to uphold the freedoms that flag represents. Because we are fortunate enough to live in a free country, it is expected that occasionally we will be offended by others exercising their rights to free expression.


Allowing flag desecration as an offensive protest is what makes America a truly free country. Not only would a law against flag desecration be against the idea of a free country, it would be impossible to enforce. Flag burning essay order to prevent any possible banning of flag burning, it must be recognized that flag burning does not equate to violence. There also must be a time, place and reason to burn a flag flag burning essay support of a cause, flag burning essay. Any attempt at violence that comes from the protester could then be charged for improper use of his freedom. Our freedoms are not to be taken advantage of, yet our opinions are not to be silenced.


Works Cited Apel, Warren S. Exploring Constitutional Law, flag burning essay. People For the American Way. Oyez Project. Texas v. Thoreau, Henry David, flag burning essay. Civil Disobedience. New York: Bantam Books, This essay was written by a fellow student, flag burning essay. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Choose skilled expert on your subject flag burning essay get original paper with free plagiarism report. Flag Burning — a Persuasive. Accessed January 7, In case you can't find a relevant example, flag burning essay, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper.


Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match. Home Government Politics Civil Rights Freedom of Speech. Academic anxiety? Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. Get your paper price experts online. An Analysis of Airport Passenger Facility Charges. Pros and Cons of Government Intervention. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements? Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report Order custom flag burning essay Without paying upfront. Related Topics Censorship Civil Rights Act of President Prostitution Gender Issues Democracy Social exclusion Drugs Same Sex Marriage Human Nature Poverty Racism Humanism NAACP City Abortion Gun Control Policy Black Lives Matter Cloning.


You may also find these documents helpful Texas vs Johnson: the Flag Burning Case. Is Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment? Essay — Flag Burning Protest. Essay — Flag Burning. Persuasive: The Confederate Flag As A Symbol Of Hate. Flag Wars — Independent Film Documentary, flag burning essay. The Salvation Army Flag. The Issue of Flag Desecration. Patriotism and The American Flag. Hi, my name is Amy �� In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Get help with your paper.


We use cookies to give you the flag burning essay experience possible.





private peaceful essay



Although I am neither nor or against the burning of the flag, I believe the right should not be taken away. I believe that if a group. The American Flag can be seen almost anywhere. From the high-school, to the ball park, and even in our homes, the American flag stands as a symbol of all that is good and true in America. When one thinks of the flag, they usually think of the blood that was shed for this country. It was shed so that we could have liberties, such as, freedom of speech and expression, which fall under the first amendment rights of the Constitution.


However, when you think of a burning flag, what comes to mind. Flag Burning There is a great travesty going on in America right now. The act of publicly burning an American flag is something that is deemed disgraceful by many Americans, but it should not be outlawed. Many people are offended by the act of publicly. Abstract Several times in our nation's history, Congress has introduced a bill that would provide for banning flag desecration. Each time, however, the Supreme Court ruled that this act was protected by the First Amendment freedom of speech rights.


The debate over this topic continues, with both sides arguing for "the good of the country. Jackson wrote, "The freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much" qtd. Is Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment? Can an individual be prosecuted for openly burning the American flag in a political protest? Gregory Johnson did this in a political protest outside Dallas City Hall. He was then tried and convicted of desecrating a venerated object under a Texas law Penal Code The question of whether this Texas law is in violation. What is flag burning? Branching off of that there is also flag desecration, which is basically abusing a flag in public. Some people may be completely oblivious to the fact that others even burn flags.


There are only two reasons that someone would want to burn a flag. One reason is out of respect People before lawyers org. When a flag is old, and worn out it is never supposed to just be thrown away. The First Amendment protects our speech and forms of expression and it is considered one of the most important Amendments. Flag burning is considered, as far as the Supreme Court is concerned, as a form of expression. Ironically, on the same terms, the First Amendment can bring punishment. The controversy of the legality of flag desecration was taken to the Supreme Court.


Johnson was punished by having to serve a one year jail sentence and a fine for two thousand dollars Oyez. After he paid his fine and served his jail time, he took his case to the Supreme Court where it was fount that desecration of the flag was protected as a freedom of expression under the First Amendment Oyez. Flag burning is not intended to represent violence; that is not to be confused with protest. There needs to be a proper time, place and valid reason to show support for a certain view. A person cannot go with irrational anger to shove his two-cents down the throats of all the surrounding people. Flag burning is to be thought of more as a demonstration to attract attention and spread around an ucommon thought reather than a disruption in society.


A large group of people have correlating opinions with the world-reknownd transcendentalist author Hendry David Thoreau. Paranoia is definitely an obstable within the government. What if the protester becomes violent? Why should we even allow him to begin his demonstration? Granted, that situation could very well happen with the low tolerance that is continuing to grow, but it is not valid that the only trigger of the war would be the flag. Ther must be other previous issues that have been unreolved and big enough that people would be willing to fight for them. By this prevelant paranoia approach, the government could easily overstep its bounds and restrict more than just flag burning.


This would, in turn, cause a revolt against the government and not the support that the government is looking for. Passing an amendment to protect the flag would be a harsh insult to all the veterans who fought so hard to uphold the freedoms that flag represents. Because we are fortunate enough to live in a free country, it is expected that occasionally we will be offended by others exercising their rights to free expression. Allowing flag desecration as an offensive protest is what makes America a truly free country. Not only would a law against flag desecration be against the idea of a free country, it would be impossible to enforce.


In order to prevent any possible banning of flag burning, it must be recognized that flag burning does not equate to violence. There also must be a time, place and reason to burn a flag in support of a cause. Although, on the contrary, many believe that he has brought a great deal of attention to the subject. Colin Kaepernick does have the freedom to kneel during the National Anthem but Colin has many other ways protest his beliefs. Johnson and United States v. In Douglas Kmiec 's article, he says, "The anti-flag outcome of both cases triggered widespread and sincere outrage on the part of the American public and equally insincere partisanship by some of its elected officials.


When the U. Supreme Court made their decision they did not take into consideration that without any form of communication accompanying the action of burning the American flag, there would be no need to allow the burning of the American flag legal using the first amendment. Lewis says, "Congress should have the authority to protect those things that are special to us as a people. But if some people would agree with Johnson because they believe that it was his freedom of speech. Even if he would have known that he is still disrespected to the men and the families that lost them. He should have thought of an….


Allen explains since burning an American flag causes an eruption of actions how could one ever say the flag is in danger when an event like this causes this amount of emotion? They believe that if anything thing is done to the flag everything that it stands for will be destroyed and that we, as Americans should not be allowed to disrespect the flag. But that goes against our rights of freedom of speech. In North Carolina Colony they required all men to fight in the war minus a few religious exceptions! This is just wrong because the people should have been able to decide on if they want to be a Loyalist or a Patriot. The United States is trying to make it so that burning the flag is criminal behavior, to the point where you can be punished, but what they need to understand is speech Limiting the freedoms of the bill of right does not make us more patriotic, but threatens our core belief system.


Limiting the freedoms of the bill of right does not make us more patriotic, but threatens our core belief system, and lastly Our democracy is strong because we tolerate all peaceful forms of expression, no matter how uncomfortable they make us feel or how much we disagree. Initially, people dislike the idea of others disrespecting the nation when they do these acts, but contrary to that belief they are not disrespecting the nation at all. Instead they are respecting…. C The sight of the Vietnamese on American soil made it impossible to forget the war that shook the entire nation. The American public did not, or chose not to, realize that these refugees were in much more need of a recovery.


They faced atrocities that were far worse than what the American public had faced. To be a true melting pot, these people would need to be fully accepted and assimilated into the American identity and culture.

No comments:

Post a Comment